Independent Licensed Agent
hey there
Initial screening After an article is submitted to a journal, a journal editor screens the manuscript and decides whether or not to send it for full peer review. Only after clearing the initial screening is the article sent to two or more independent peer reviewers . Editors will consider the following aspects: Is the manuscript good enough quality to be sent for peer review? Does it conform to the aims and scope of the journal and has it followed the style guidelines and instructions for authors? Does it make a significant contribution to the existing literature? Unsuitable articles may be rejected without peer review at the editor’s discretion. If the article passes these initial checks, it will be sent for peer review. Benefits of carrying out this initial screening include: A quick decision for authors – if the manuscript clearly lies outside the scope of the journal, then a rapid rejection allows the author to submit their article to another journal more quickly. Peer reviewers’ time is not wasted – reviewers don’t have to spend time evaluating and giving feedback for a manuscript of clearly inferior quality. The peer review process Once an article has passed the initial screening process, it’s sent for peer review. As an editor, you’ll appreciate the amount of effort that goes into the peer review process. There are many people involved, including: You as an editor A team of associate editors An administrator The reviewers Editorial board members The Taylor & Francis Peer Review and Online Submissions teams Your Taylor & Francis Portfolio Managers There are different types of peer review operated by different journals. But no matter what type of peer review your journal uses, there are plenty of intricate parts to keep everyone busy. Taking care of the initial checks, assigning the right associate editor, finding enough willing reviewers, assigning reviewers, and checking for ethical issues are all key parts of the process. Not to mention the actual task of writing the review. Editors need to be careful to select reviewers who have sufficient subject matter expertise to do justice to the article they’re reviewing. You can read more about finding reviewers on the ‘How to find reviewers’ section below. Given all this, it’s no wonder that peer review takes time. How long does peer review take? A question often asked by authors, but also important to editors, is how long does it take between submission and publication of an article. This is a hard question to answer, but often peer review is the lengthiest part of this process. Journals usually ask reviewers to complete their reviews within 3-4 weeks. However, few journals have a mechanism to enforce the deadline, which is why it can be hard to predict how long the peer review process will take. It’s also worth bearing in mind that highly technical papers or papers from niche subject areas could take longer to review because it often takes editors more time to find appropriate reviewers. However, there are things you can do as an editor to make peer review more effective and efficient. Focus your efforts on good time management and supplying high-quality reviews. Being aware of the following potential delays can help you limit their effects: Difficulty in finding appropriate reviewers Delayed response from reviewers Unhelpful review reports – reviews that are a single sentence or paragraph are unhelpful to authors or editors. A normal review report should be two to three pages in length, sometimes longer. (Read how to write a review report.) The final decision Editors have various options when it comes to making a decision on an article. The following are the most common decisions made: Accept without any changes (acceptance): the journal will publish the article in its original form. Accept with minor revisions (acceptance): the journal will publish the article once the author has made some small corrections. Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): the journal will publish the article if the authors make changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors. Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): the journal will reconsider the article in another round of decision making once the authors have made major changes. Reject the paper (outright rejection): the journal won’t publish the article or reconsider it.
hey there
jack reviews................
Nicee Agent
test
A review is an evaluation of a publication, product, service, or company or a critical take on current affairs in literature, politics or culture. In addition to a critical evaluation, the review\'s author may assign the work a rating to indicate its relative merit.
test
test!!
testingggggggg
ldgk;ladsk;l
wetwe
Retesting again
Nicee Agent...
test comment for sahil kumar agent.
Lorem ipsum simply dummy text.
It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout. The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using \'Content here, content here\', making it look like readable English.
Tezst
Test
Test